Awesome question! π€β¨ Letβs break down Visual Transformers (also called Vision Transformers or ViTs) in a super simple and clear wayπ§ ποΈβπ¨οΈπ
π§ What Are Visual Transformers?
Visual Transformers are deep learning models that use the Transformer architecture (originally made for text π) to analyze images πΌοΈ instead of using CNNs (Convolutional Neural Networks).
They were introduced in the paper “An Image is Worth 16×16 Words” by Google in 2020 ππ
π¦ Basic Idea:
Think of an image as a puzzle π§©:
- We break the image into small patches (like mini-images)
- Each patch is treated like a “word” in NLP π§Ύ
- Then the Transformer learns relationships between these patches (like it does with words in a sentence!)
π How It Works (Simply Explained):
Step 1οΈβ£: π§© Image to Patches
- Divide the image into small square patches (e.g., 16Γ16 pixels each)
- Flatten each patch into a vector π
Step 2οΈβ£: π§ Embed the Patches
- Just like word embeddings in text, each patch is turned into a numeric vector
- Add position info so the model knows where each patch belongs in the image π§
Step 3οΈβ£: π Transformer Encoder
- Feed all patch vectors into the transformer
- It uses self-attention to learn relationships between different parts of the image ποΈβπ¨οΈ
Step 4οΈβ£: π§Ύ Classification or Output
- The final output is usually a classification token (like in BERT for text) that predicts the image class (e.g., “cat” π± or “car” π)
π ViT vs CNN (Whatβs the Difference?)
Feature | CNN π§ | ViT π€ |
---|---|---|
Works with | Pixels directly | Image patches |
Learns using | Convolutions (filters) | Attention (relationships) |
Position Awareness | Built-in (via structure) | Needs positional encoding |
Data Requirement | Works well on small data | Needs lots of data or pretraining |
Interpretability | Less clear | More explainable with attention β¨ |
π§ͺ Where Are Visual Transformers Used?
β
Image classification (e.g., cat vs dog) πΆπ±
β
Object detection π§π¦
β
Image segmentation π§ π§©
β
Medical imaging π§¬
β
Video analysis π₯
π Pros and Cons
β Pros | β Cons |
---|---|
Great at global understanding π | Needs more data to train |
Works better with pretraining ποΈ | Slower than CNNs on small tasks π |
Easy to scale ποΈ | More complex to implement π» |
π― TL;DR:
Visual Transformers = Transformer + Images
They slice images into patches π§©, treat them like words π, and use attention to “understand” the image π§ ποΈβπ¨οΈ β just like how Transformers understand sentences!